Comments on: LGBT leaders endorse John Edwards http://www.interstateq.com/archives/1976/ LGBT news/opinion from Matt Comer, journalist, activist Sat, 13 Mar 2010 18:48:04 -0700 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Joe T. http://www.interstateq.com/archives/1976/comment-page-1/#comment-38273 Joe T. Sat, 14 Apr 2007 06:45:11 +0000 http://www.interstateq.com/archives/1976/#comment-38273 Sorry guys, I'll take Giuliani (I guess I'm going Republican this time, though I'm an Independent). I loved him ever since he lived with that gay couple throughout the whole 9-11 crisis and trumpeted it as one of the best relationships he'd ever seen. (LOL- no, that's not the ONLY reason I love him). Sorry guys, I’ll take Giuliani (I guess I’m going Republican this time, though I’m an Independent). I loved him ever since he lived with that gay couple throughout the whole 9-11 crisis and trumpeted it as one of the best relationships he’d ever seen. (LOL- no, that’s not the ONLY reason I love him).

]]> By: Matt http://www.interstateq.com/archives/1976/comment-page-1/#comment-38204 Matt Wed, 11 Apr 2007 22:30:51 +0000 http://www.interstateq.com/archives/1976/#comment-38204 Ryan... I don't know how well you keep up with LGBT politics, but there is certainly a battle with Democratic candidates over which one is going to turn out to be the most supportive of our community. Just take one look at the cover of the current issue of THE ADVOCATE and you'll see what I mean. In that cover article in THE ADVOCATE, there was supposed to be a sidebar on John Edwards and his positions and supporters (I was going to be included in that sidebar), but it got cut out during the final edit. I'm not surprised that since Clinton and Obama got so much coverage in this major LGBT-oriented news magazine that the Edwards campaign had to come up with something to say, "Hey... I'm supportive, too!" Is it at all surprising that I'm supporting him for the primary? I think Edwards would be best. In all honesty, I think it should be an Edwards/Obama ticket (whichever gets Pres and VP I don't care). Honestly, I believe it is just BAD for America if one family controls the White House for what could be almost three decades (that is, if Clinton is elected in 08 and gets re-elected in 2012). Ryan… I don’t know how well you keep up with LGBT politics, but there is certainly a battle with Democratic candidates over which one is going to turn out to be the most supportive of our community. Just take one look at the cover of the current issue of THE ADVOCATE and you’ll see what I mean. In that cover article in THE ADVOCATE, there was supposed to be a sidebar on John Edwards and his positions and supporters (I was going to be included in that sidebar), but it got cut out during the final edit. I’m not surprised that since Clinton and Obama got so much coverage in this major LGBT-oriented news magazine that the Edwards campaign had to come up with something to say, “Hey… I’m supportive, too!”

Is it at all surprising that I’m supporting him for the primary? I think Edwards would be best. In all honesty, I think it should be an Edwards/Obama ticket (whichever gets Pres and VP I don’t care). Honestly, I believe it is just BAD for America if one family controls the White House for what could be almost three decades (that is, if Clinton is elected in 08 and gets re-elected in 2012).

]]> By: Ryan http://www.interstateq.com/archives/1976/comment-page-1/#comment-38201 Ryan Wed, 11 Apr 2007 22:15:29 +0000 http://www.interstateq.com/archives/1976/#comment-38201 That they'd endorse him. That they’d endorse him.

]]> By: Matt http://www.interstateq.com/archives/1976/comment-page-1/#comment-38197 Matt Wed, 11 Apr 2007 21:58:08 +0000 http://www.interstateq.com/archives/1976/#comment-38197 What's a surprise? What’s a surprise?

]]> By: Ryan http://www.interstateq.com/archives/1976/comment-page-1/#comment-38186 Ryan Wed, 11 Apr 2007 16:55:46 +0000 http://www.interstateq.com/archives/1976/#comment-38186 There's a surprise. There’s a surprise.

]]>