Can the Clintons be trusted?
by Matt | May 30th, 2007 |It is no secret that I’ve made a few enemies over the way I’ve treated the Republican Party, at least publicly and in my writings.
Truth be told, most of my best friends are Republican - some of them more conservative, some of them more middle of the road. What the Republicans have in regard to LGBT equality that the Democrats don’t have, however, is honesty.
I don’t have to guess and wonder where my friends stand politically or ideologically or religiously when it comes to the issues surrounding my civil equality. They don’t lie to me and they tell me what they think without trying to sugar-coat it. Have I gotten frustrated with some of my friends before? Well, yes, but again… I never have to guess what they are thinking; I already know.
The same is not true of the Democrats and especially of the Clintons.
Bob Shrum’s new book has caused quite the stir over supposed comments made by my darling John Edwards. Almost a decade ago back in 1998, according to Shrum, Edwards said he “wasn’t comfortable around” gays. I’m able to forgive this - I hope. Look at how much America has changed in the past decade. And Edwards certainly is the most outspoken Democratic favorable toward our issues.
Shrum’s book, however, now gives us a revealing look into the advice Bill Clinton gave John Kerry:
A version of this story is already in print. In 2004, Newsweek reported, without a named source, that Bill Clinton had suggested Kerry “to back local bans on gay marriage.”
Shrum has more, and different, detail:
“Clinton, Kerry reported at the time, did suggest blunting Bush’s appeal to cultural conservatives with a reprise of Clinton’s Sister Souljah moment in 1992 when he’d denounced her call for violence against whites — and done it as conspicuously as possible in front of Jesse Jackson’s Rainbow Coalition.
“Kerry, Clinton ventured, should consider defying Democratic interest groups by endorsing the Bush proposal for a federal constitutional amendment banning gay marriage.”
Shrum reports that “this was a flip-flop too far for Kerry.”
I have never really trusted the Clintons. I don’t know exactly why, but I just never have. There is something about them I just find to come off as untrustworthy.
I understand that under Bill Clinton’s administration in the 1990s, America was so much better-off than we are now, but still: Clinton was also the one who promised to get rid of anti-LGBT discrimination in the Armed Forces and then turned his back and signed “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell.” Clinton also signed the Federal Defense of Marriage Act.
I get this little feeling that the Clintons only say and do what is politically expedient for them at whatever time they need to say it or do it. It frustrates me.
But it is just a “feeling.” I have nothing to really back it up. Am I over-reacted? Do I have a legitimate concern? I don’t know.
I do know, however, that I will be voting for John Edwards in the North Carolina primary. I’ll figure out what I’ll do for the General Elections when they hit, because I have a good feeling that Edwards won’t be there. Oh well.




4 Responses to “Can the Clintons be trusted?”
Did your post get accidentally chopped?
In any case, don’t forget your token libertarian friend! I’m an equal-opportunity malcontent.
“The only people I fear are young conservatives and old liberals.”
–Attributed to Winston Churcill.
By KipEsquire on May 30, 2007
Never mind — I see the rest of it now.
By KipEsquire on May 30, 2007
Matt,
I too can relate to where you are coming from in this article, however I wanted to leave my own perspective. First, is that Hillary has always been a vocal advocate for LGBT rights. Her time in the US Senate shows us that and she has pledged to not sidestep our issues - for the sake of popularity. Have you seen the YouTube of Hillary at HRC’s Board Meeting:
To be honest, Hillary has my attention. Many say “We’re not ready for a woman President” but after eight years of Dubba, I gotta say that maybe Hillary is perfect for us.
Also, I wanted to get your take on Barack Obama? He has my attention for the simple and eloquent way that he approaches politics.
What I certainly see, especially for the LGBT community, is that we must come to the table with an open heart and allow each candidate to be open and honest with us. John Edwards does not support full equality for us. That’s sad, because I think John is a great leader and will be a great asset to the White House. Of course, who we vote for, is a personal decision based on various criteria important to us.
Just my thoughts.. would love to see a follow up…
~ Brandon Greeson
http://www.brandongreeson.com
By Brandon Greeson on May 30, 2007
The video didn’t post above, here is the link:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bSPxGmePSiA
By Brandon Greeson on May 30, 2007