<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Anti-gay group hosts &#8220;Can you be Gay &amp; Christian&#8221; forum</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.interstateq.com/archives/2391/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.interstateq.com/archives/2391/</link>
	<description>LGBT news/opinion from Matt Comer, journalist, activist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 18:48:04 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: InterstateQ.com&#8217;s top stories of 2007 &#183; InterstateQ.com &#187; LGBT news/opinion from Matt Comer, journalist, activist</title>
		<link>http://www.interstateq.com/archives/2391/comment-page-1/#comment-66936</link>
		<dc:creator>InterstateQ.com&#8217;s top stories of 2007 &#183; InterstateQ.com &#187; LGBT news/opinion from Matt Comer, journalist, activist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 17:01:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.interstateq.com/archives/2391/#comment-66936</guid>
		<description>[...] you be Gay and Christian? On Sept. 20, I attended a &#8220;forum&#8221; entitled &#8220;Can you be Gay and Christian&#8221; hosted by the anti-gay, right-wing Coalition of Conscience (or CoC). The forum, or so leader [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] you be Gay and Christian? On Sept. 20, I attended a &#8220;forum&#8221; entitled &#8220;Can you be Gay and Christian&#8221; hosted by the anti-gay, right-wing Coalition of Conscience (or CoC). The forum, or so leader [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: An awkward &#8216;homecoming&#8217; - Part Two - A Grapevine member&#8217;s response and my responses to him &#183; InterstateQ.com</title>
		<link>http://www.interstateq.com/archives/2391/comment-page-1/#comment-65018</link>
		<dc:creator>An awkward &#8216;homecoming&#8217; - Part Two - A Grapevine member&#8217;s response and my responses to him &#183; InterstateQ.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 05:06:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.interstateq.com/archives/2391/#comment-65018</guid>
		<description>[...] Matt Comer&#8217;s Testimony &#8212; Anti-gay group hosts &#8220;Can you be Gay and Christian?&#8221; forum [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Matt Comer&#8217;s Testimony &#8212; Anti-gay group hosts &#8220;Can you be Gay and Christian?&#8221; forum [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: InterstateQ.com &#187; N.C. anti-gay leader slammed on Air America</title>
		<link>http://www.interstateq.com/archives/2391/comment-page-1/#comment-53220</link>
		<dc:creator>InterstateQ.com &#187; N.C. anti-gay leader slammed on Air America</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 11:09:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.interstateq.com/archives/2391/#comment-53220</guid>
		<description>[...] Michael Brown of the Concord, N.C. based Coalition of Conscience, the man and organization responsible for the &#8220;Can you be gay and Christian?&#8221; forum in mid-September, appeared as a guest on Air America Radio&#8217;s Thom Hartmann Show yesterday [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Michael Brown of the Concord, N.C. based Coalition of Conscience, the man and organization responsible for the &#8220;Can you be gay and Christian?&#8221; forum in mid-September, appeared as a guest on Air America Radio&#8217;s Thom Hartmann Show yesterday [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: InterstateQ.com &#187; Right-wing church plans &#8216;dialogue&#8217; on gay issues, in response to gay Charlotteans</title>
		<link>http://www.interstateq.com/archives/2391/comment-page-1/#comment-53162</link>
		<dc:creator>InterstateQ.com &#187; Right-wing church plans &#8216;dialogue&#8217; on gay issues, in response to gay Charlotteans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 00:57:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.interstateq.com/archives/2391/#comment-53162</guid>
		<description>[...] NOTE that an update and story on the forum on the evening of September 20th has been posted. Check out the update which includes in-depth commentary and video &amp; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] NOTE that an update and story on the forum on the evening of September 20th has been posted. Check out the update which includes in-depth commentary and video &amp; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Casey</title>
		<link>http://www.interstateq.com/archives/2391/comment-page-1/#comment-51724</link>
		<dc:creator>Casey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 02:00:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.interstateq.com/archives/2391/#comment-51724</guid>
		<description>Kelsey,
When it comes to the nature of scripture, I don&#039;t think we&#039;re disagreeing as much as you seem to believe.  I&#039;m with you in that the text of the Bible is true.  I just don&#039;t think that text means what you think it means - I think that with regard to homosexuality, Christians have misinterpreted that text, for a variety of reasons.  Gay Christians like myself take the Bible seriously, and have good reasons for believing that it does not categorically condemn same-sex relationships.  (Justin Cannon over at inclusiveorthodoxy.com has a pretty decent, brief explanation of the basis for that interpretation - given your openness to dialogue, I highly recommend you check it out.)  Basically, there&#039;s nothing about a committed same-sex relationship that contradicts scripture as we understand it.  Condemning such relationships, and discriminating against them, however, would be a sin - &quot;call not what I have cleansed unclean&quot; and all that.

I&#039;m glad you mentioned Nicodemus and the idea of being born again - do you recall the rest of that exchange?  There was confusion about how a man could be born again, because clearly he could not physically return to his mother&#039;s womb - at which point, Jesus pointed out that this rebirth is a spiritual thing.  Over and over in the gospels, people don&#039;t get this concept, insisting that the physical is what matters, rather than intangibles like faith and the work of the spirit.  I think we&#039;re running into the same issue today with regard to homosexuality - an obsession with the physical aspect of the behaviors condemned in Leviticus (anal sex) rather than the motive for such an action (in the context of that society, either idolatry, rape/dominance of an enemy, or degrading somebody as being less than a man).  The spirit of an action is often what gives it moral significance, and that is the case with sexual behavior, straight or gay.

As you say, Jesus never contradicted scripture - but he did often clarify it.  You actually contradicted yourself above, by implying that Jesus changed the law by raising the standards - not only was it wrong to murder, but also to hate.  Thing is, it was always wrong to hate - the hatred imbued in murder is what makes it wrong.  Same with homosexuality - it was the motive behind the actions that made them condemned in a lot of contexts - but unlike murder, it is possible for two people of the same sex to be intimate with pure hearts... and it is that intimacy I&#039;m defending as never having been condemned.

Finally - I believe it is absolutely possible for somebody who is gay to be born again and to remain gay... because I&#039;ve been blessed by God to have done so.  In many ways, my previous self has died, and my life has changed.  I know what it feels like for the Spirit to convict me of sin, even sexual sin... and I also know what it feels like when God reminds me that I am fearfully and wonderfully made in His image... and that includes my sexual orientation.  Many straight people have been born again, and recognized that their sexual behavior was improper - so they change their behavior, but it does not change their orientation.  The same thing happens with gay people - our attitudes toward sex can change, but the object of that desire does not.  That does not mean the old life has not died - it only means that the orientation is not what Christ is changing in me.  There is no need.  

I implore you - for the sake of argument, imagine what it would mean if I&#039;m right, and homosexuality is not a sin.  What does that tell you about God, that the homosexual is also made in His image?  What do we discover about God in the loving bond between two men, or two women?  Isn&#039;t there something divine about a relationship of love and mutual sacrifice that nobody can ever claim is just &quot;nature&#039;s way of fooling us into breeding&quot;?  Something supernatural about the choice of such couples to make homes for the rejected children of the world, adopting them into their families freely, in a way that mirrors God&#039;s choice to adopt us all?  Think about it. Pray.  Then respond - I&#039;ll be waiting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kelsey,<br />
When it comes to the nature of scripture, I don&#8217;t think we&#8217;re disagreeing as much as you seem to believe.  I&#8217;m with you in that the text of the Bible is true.  I just don&#8217;t think that text means what you think it means &#8211; I think that with regard to homosexuality, Christians have misinterpreted that text, for a variety of reasons.  Gay Christians like myself take the Bible seriously, and have good reasons for believing that it does not categorically condemn same-sex relationships.  (Justin Cannon over at inclusiveorthodoxy.com has a pretty decent, brief explanation of the basis for that interpretation &#8211; given your openness to dialogue, I highly recommend you check it out.)  Basically, there&#8217;s nothing about a committed same-sex relationship that contradicts scripture as we understand it.  Condemning such relationships, and discriminating against them, however, would be a sin &#8211; &#8220;call not what I have cleansed unclean&#8221; and all that.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m glad you mentioned Nicodemus and the idea of being born again &#8211; do you recall the rest of that exchange?  There was confusion about how a man could be born again, because clearly he could not physically return to his mother&#8217;s womb &#8211; at which point, Jesus pointed out that this rebirth is a spiritual thing.  Over and over in the gospels, people don&#8217;t get this concept, insisting that the physical is what matters, rather than intangibles like faith and the work of the spirit.  I think we&#8217;re running into the same issue today with regard to homosexuality &#8211; an obsession with the physical aspect of the behaviors condemned in Leviticus (anal sex) rather than the motive for such an action (in the context of that society, either idolatry, rape/dominance of an enemy, or degrading somebody as being less than a man).  The spirit of an action is often what gives it moral significance, and that is the case with sexual behavior, straight or gay.</p>
<p>As you say, Jesus never contradicted scripture &#8211; but he did often clarify it.  You actually contradicted yourself above, by implying that Jesus changed the law by raising the standards &#8211; not only was it wrong to murder, but also to hate.  Thing is, it was always wrong to hate &#8211; the hatred imbued in murder is what makes it wrong.  Same with homosexuality &#8211; it was the motive behind the actions that made them condemned in a lot of contexts &#8211; but unlike murder, it is possible for two people of the same sex to be intimate with pure hearts&#8230; and it is that intimacy I&#8217;m defending as never having been condemned.</p>
<p>Finally &#8211; I believe it is absolutely possible for somebody who is gay to be born again and to remain gay&#8230; because I&#8217;ve been blessed by God to have done so.  In many ways, my previous self has died, and my life has changed.  I know what it feels like for the Spirit to convict me of sin, even sexual sin&#8230; and I also know what it feels like when God reminds me that I am fearfully and wonderfully made in His image&#8230; and that includes my sexual orientation.  Many straight people have been born again, and recognized that their sexual behavior was improper &#8211; so they change their behavior, but it does not change their orientation.  The same thing happens with gay people &#8211; our attitudes toward sex can change, but the object of that desire does not.  That does not mean the old life has not died &#8211; it only means that the orientation is not what Christ is changing in me.  There is no need.  </p>
<p>I implore you &#8211; for the sake of argument, imagine what it would mean if I&#8217;m right, and homosexuality is not a sin.  What does that tell you about God, that the homosexual is also made in His image?  What do we discover about God in the loving bond between two men, or two women?  Isn&#8217;t there something divine about a relationship of love and mutual sacrifice that nobody can ever claim is just &#8220;nature&#8217;s way of fooling us into breeding&#8221;?  Something supernatural about the choice of such couples to make homes for the rejected children of the world, adopting them into their families freely, in a way that mirrors God&#8217;s choice to adopt us all?  Think about it. Pray.  Then respond &#8211; I&#8217;ll be waiting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelsey</title>
		<link>http://www.interstateq.com/archives/2391/comment-page-1/#comment-51558</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelsey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 04:09:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.interstateq.com/archives/2391/#comment-51558</guid>
		<description>Hey Casey,
You&#039;ve raised some good questions as well. :)
I actually do believe that God allows people to misinterpret His word, in the sense that God has given mankind free will and He is not going to make people think rightly. I will clarify though that I believe all misinterpretations happen outside of the Bible itself. Everything written in the Scriptures is not man&#039;s opinion, but it is God&#039;s opinion, which is steadfast.
Yes, I do believe that we grow in our knowledge and understanding of God, but that should never contradict Scripture. The Bible is our written guide on how we should live, and even though the Holy Spirit moves and gives us revelations of who God is, He will never contradict the Word either. Jesus Himself never contradicted Scripture and He is not about to begin. God does not suffer from multiple personalites.
I do not wish to downplay your struggle here though. I do believe that you were &quot;born that way&quot; in the sense that all of mankind is born with a sin nature, but everyone has different tendensies/weaknesses that they struggle with. Nicodemus came to Jesus and Jesus told him that he had to be &quot;born again&quot; (John 3). In order to begin the new life, the old life has to die. The two cannot co-exist with each other. 2 Cor 5:17 says, &quot;Therefore if anyone is in Christ he is a new creation; the old has gone, the new has come!&quot; If anyone is going to be &quot;in Christ&quot; the old life has to die. It&#039;s not always easy...im not going to lie and say that it is. Some things are more deeply rooted than others and they take more time for uprooting (though God could certainly do it in an instant).
And though I know you would differ with me, I would consider homosexuality an issue of the heart, not merely a physical issue, such as the blind man. Desire is rooted in the heart. Jesus came to change hearts, so why would it be any different for homosexuals?
I am sorry for any real hatred or cruelty that the Church has responded to you with; for that i apologize. Jesus respondes much differently than most of that.
Thank you for your openess and willingness to share with me, it is much appreciated.

In Him,
Kelsey</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Casey,<br />
You&#8217;ve raised some good questions as well. <img src='http://www.interstateq.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
I actually do believe that God allows people to misinterpret His word, in the sense that God has given mankind free will and He is not going to make people think rightly. I will clarify though that I believe all misinterpretations happen outside of the Bible itself. Everything written in the Scriptures is not man&#8217;s opinion, but it is God&#8217;s opinion, which is steadfast.<br />
Yes, I do believe that we grow in our knowledge and understanding of God, but that should never contradict Scripture. The Bible is our written guide on how we should live, and even though the Holy Spirit moves and gives us revelations of who God is, He will never contradict the Word either. Jesus Himself never contradicted Scripture and He is not about to begin. God does not suffer from multiple personalites.<br />
I do not wish to downplay your struggle here though. I do believe that you were &#8220;born that way&#8221; in the sense that all of mankind is born with a sin nature, but everyone has different tendensies/weaknesses that they struggle with. Nicodemus came to Jesus and Jesus told him that he had to be &#8220;born again&#8221; (John 3). In order to begin the new life, the old life has to die. The two cannot co-exist with each other. 2 Cor 5:17 says, &#8220;Therefore if anyone is in Christ he is a new creation; the old has gone, the new has come!&#8221; If anyone is going to be &#8220;in Christ&#8221; the old life has to die. It&#8217;s not always easy&#8230;im not going to lie and say that it is. Some things are more deeply rooted than others and they take more time for uprooting (though God could certainly do it in an instant).<br />
And though I know you would differ with me, I would consider homosexuality an issue of the heart, not merely a physical issue, such as the blind man. Desire is rooted in the heart. Jesus came to change hearts, so why would it be any different for homosexuals?<br />
I am sorry for any real hatred or cruelty that the Church has responded to you with; for that i apologize. Jesus respondes much differently than most of that.<br />
Thank you for your openess and willingness to share with me, it is much appreciated.</p>
<p>In Him,<br />
Kelsey</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelsey</title>
		<link>http://www.interstateq.com/archives/2391/comment-page-1/#comment-51542</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelsey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 01:54:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.interstateq.com/archives/2391/#comment-51542</guid>
		<description>Hey Matt,
I appologize for this late reply, I was out of town for the weekend. 
Anyway, I guess I should clarify my views on the Word of God. I do not belive that it is just words on a page. The Bible is inspired by God and it is alive. Jesus was called the Word and I do believe that He is the Word walked out in the flesh. 
You mentioned slavery, and I think that is a prime example of people people can interpret the Word to advocate/prove their wrong beliefs. Slavery in Biblical times, especially among the Jews, was very different than it was a couple hundred years ago here in the states and the rest of the world. Slavery was not based on race back then but mostly on social status. People would sell themselves into slavery to help pay off a debt, or if they wanted all of their needs to be provided for by a master. So I belive the culture needs to be understood better when it comes to this issue.
When it comes to the new covenant, if anything the standard rises. Jesus begins to deal directly with the heart. Now, not only is something a sin when you do it outwardly, but it is a sin when commited inwardly. For example, not only murder is sin, but hating your brother. Not only is adultery sin, but lusting after another. He deals with the conditions of the heart.
When it comes to the outward rules that changed, they were mentioned in the New Testament, such as when God told Peter in the vision that he was to call nothing unclean that God has made clean, speaking about the food laws at the time. (Acts 10) Paul himself ate with the gentiles, which probably included pork from time to time. 
I know a lot of times an argument for homosexuality, is that Jesus never mentioned it as sin, so its ok. 
I think that the reason that he didn&#039;t mention it, was there were no changes that needed to be made to what was already mentioned, in the Old Testament on that issue, as far as whether or not it was sin. (Mind you, some of the direct punishments of the Old Testament for sins have changed with the new covenant and that was laid out in the NT. If you want references i can get them to you.) 
Now there is no doubt in my mind that Jesus loves homosexuals, and i agree that He did come to set us free from hatred and He calls us to walk out our lives in love for one another. 
I&#039;ll leave you with this analogy. There is a man who is blindfolded and en route to walking over the endge of a cliff. One man informs him of his direction and tries to stop him, even to the point of trying to take off the man&#039;s blindfold so he can see. Another man looks at the man, but says &quot;I don&#039;t want to bother him, it&#039;s his life.&quot; Which one truly loves the man? Which one is his friend?

I really appreciate you allowing me to dialogue with you and I hope we can continue. :D

In Him,
Kelsey</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Matt,<br />
I appologize for this late reply, I was out of town for the weekend.<br />
Anyway, I guess I should clarify my views on the Word of God. I do not belive that it is just words on a page. The Bible is inspired by God and it is alive. Jesus was called the Word and I do believe that He is the Word walked out in the flesh.<br />
You mentioned slavery, and I think that is a prime example of people people can interpret the Word to advocate/prove their wrong beliefs. Slavery in Biblical times, especially among the Jews, was very different than it was a couple hundred years ago here in the states and the rest of the world. Slavery was not based on race back then but mostly on social status. People would sell themselves into slavery to help pay off a debt, or if they wanted all of their needs to be provided for by a master. So I belive the culture needs to be understood better when it comes to this issue.<br />
When it comes to the new covenant, if anything the standard rises. Jesus begins to deal directly with the heart. Now, not only is something a sin when you do it outwardly, but it is a sin when commited inwardly. For example, not only murder is sin, but hating your brother. Not only is adultery sin, but lusting after another. He deals with the conditions of the heart.<br />
When it comes to the outward rules that changed, they were mentioned in the New Testament, such as when God told Peter in the vision that he was to call nothing unclean that God has made clean, speaking about the food laws at the time. (Acts 10) Paul himself ate with the gentiles, which probably included pork from time to time.<br />
I know a lot of times an argument for homosexuality, is that Jesus never mentioned it as sin, so its ok.<br />
I think that the reason that he didn&#8217;t mention it, was there were no changes that needed to be made to what was already mentioned, in the Old Testament on that issue, as far as whether or not it was sin. (Mind you, some of the direct punishments of the Old Testament for sins have changed with the new covenant and that was laid out in the NT. If you want references i can get them to you.)<br />
Now there is no doubt in my mind that Jesus loves homosexuals, and i agree that He did come to set us free from hatred and He calls us to walk out our lives in love for one another.<br />
I&#8217;ll leave you with this analogy. There is a man who is blindfolded and en route to walking over the endge of a cliff. One man informs him of his direction and tries to stop him, even to the point of trying to take off the man&#8217;s blindfold so he can see. Another man looks at the man, but says &#8220;I don&#8217;t want to bother him, it&#8217;s his life.&#8221; Which one truly loves the man? Which one is his friend?</p>
<p>I really appreciate you allowing me to dialogue with you and I hope we can continue. <img src='http://www.interstateq.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>In Him,<br />
Kelsey</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shawn Landis</title>
		<link>http://www.interstateq.com/archives/2391/comment-page-1/#comment-51077</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawn Landis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 01:02:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.interstateq.com/archives/2391/#comment-51077</guid>
		<description>Hey Matt, i skimmed over your report here.  Good deal.  i look forward to reading more of what you have here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Matt, i skimmed over your report here.  Good deal.  i look forward to reading more of what you have here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Casey</title>
		<link>http://www.interstateq.com/archives/2391/comment-page-1/#comment-51042</link>
		<dc:creator>Casey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 19:23:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.interstateq.com/archives/2391/#comment-51042</guid>
		<description>Heya Kelsey,
You raise some excellent questions, and I&#039;d like to jump in, if I may.  It&#039;s all about the assumptions you bring to the it, whether it be the Bible or these questions you&#039;ve just asked.  In asking &quot;How can Scripture truly remain the Word of God, if it is left up to the ever-changing interpretations of man to validate it?&quot; and &quot;How could He then give such conflicting “revelations” between the ages of men, both being “right”, and yet remain unchanging in His ways?&quot; you&#039;ve premised your questions on a pair assumptions.  First, that God would never allow humanity to erroneously interpret His word, or to correct itself through the movement of the Spirit, and secondly that all of humanity&#039;s conclusions about scripture have been due to His &quot;revelations&quot; through the years.  I would challenge both premises.

Throughout the Gospel, Christ begins or ends his parables with &quot;those who have ears to hear, let them hear.&quot;  His audiences included those who had read scripture, who knew the words of God in their bones... but clearly implied here is that not everybody will understand, and that some previous understandings have been flawed.  The entire Sermon on the Mount has Jesus saying &quot;you have heard it said, X, BUT I say to you...&quot; - implying that what men have been teaching about God is not what Christ meant to be taught.  Yes, God is unchanging - but our understanding of Him and His prayers for us grows as we come to know Him more, as we are molded to be more in His image.  

Do you believe the same about God now as you did in your first Bible study, your first encounter with Him?  Probably not - you&#039;ve grown wiser, discovered more about the culture into which Christ was born, its history and symbolism... you&#039;ve experienced more of life and perhaps have learned that much of the beauty of our faith is that it is a faith, and not a science... there is much we do not know, cannot know, even with the Bible in front of us.  I would dare say it asks more questions than it answers, and does so for good reason.  This book, like the challenges of our lives, point us toward God... they almost compel us to our knees to say &quot;God, why?&quot; - and through asking, coming into relationship with Him.  

You&#039;ll recall how one day, people asked Christ &quot;who sinned?” to cause a man to be born blind.  Surely, it is logical to believe that blindness is sub-optimal, as bad for humanity as, say, confusion about scripture.  But Jesus answered that nobody sinned - the man was born blind so that the glory of God might be revealed in him.  How often did the blind reach out to Christ in ways that those with sight did not?  They knew they needed God - and in much the same way, we who are hated for being glbt are driven to cry out to the Father for His love.  We know our need, we know that there are things beyond our control (how better to know that when &quot;your own&quot; body betrays you?)... we know in a way that is unique, how powerful God is, and how weak we are.  We know how amazing is His grace.  But the point here is, God uses things human beings find flawed to achieve great things.  He uses the weak to lead the strong.  

As a gay person, when I became a Christian, I had to struggle with the question of why a good God, a God that I knew loved and accepted me as I am, created me as I am... why that God would allow His church to be so cruel to His gay and lesbian children.  Such cruelty could not be the ideal for the church, same as blindness could not be the ideal for humanity, I thought.  But eventually, it came to me, like my beloved&#039;s voice whispering in my ear... the power of our God is most clearly seen in His power to redeem.  Humanity breaks things - we divide ourselves one against the other, we oppress, we are confused, we sin - but the glory of God is revealed when He takes our brokenness in hand and redeems it.  By this, I do not mean His glory is revealed when God turns gay people straight - the shattered languages of Babble were not reunited at Pentecost; the Spirit spoke to all in their own tongues, transcending division in a way which continues to impress people to this day.  I mean that God uses our brokenness for His purposes.  When the day comes that the church embraces GLBT people, transcending the sexism, privilege, pride and fear that underlie homophobia, it will bear witness to the love and greatness of God, and His promise of welcome to all - and the glory will all be His.  Until that day, I will patiently endure, tell my story, and pray that His kingdom come.

Blessings to you,
Casey</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heya Kelsey,<br />
You raise some excellent questions, and I&#8217;d like to jump in, if I may.  It&#8217;s all about the assumptions you bring to the it, whether it be the Bible or these questions you&#8217;ve just asked.  In asking &#8220;How can Scripture truly remain the Word of God, if it is left up to the ever-changing interpretations of man to validate it?&#8221; and &#8220;How could He then give such conflicting “revelations” between the ages of men, both being “right”, and yet remain unchanging in His ways?&#8221; you&#8217;ve premised your questions on a pair assumptions.  First, that God would never allow humanity to erroneously interpret His word, or to correct itself through the movement of the Spirit, and secondly that all of humanity&#8217;s conclusions about scripture have been due to His &#8220;revelations&#8221; through the years.  I would challenge both premises.</p>
<p>Throughout the Gospel, Christ begins or ends his parables with &#8220;those who have ears to hear, let them hear.&#8221;  His audiences included those who had read scripture, who knew the words of God in their bones&#8230; but clearly implied here is that not everybody will understand, and that some previous understandings have been flawed.  The entire Sermon on the Mount has Jesus saying &#8220;you have heard it said, X, BUT I say to you&#8230;&#8221; &#8211; implying that what men have been teaching about God is not what Christ meant to be taught.  Yes, God is unchanging &#8211; but our understanding of Him and His prayers for us grows as we come to know Him more, as we are molded to be more in His image.  </p>
<p>Do you believe the same about God now as you did in your first Bible study, your first encounter with Him?  Probably not &#8211; you&#8217;ve grown wiser, discovered more about the culture into which Christ was born, its history and symbolism&#8230; you&#8217;ve experienced more of life and perhaps have learned that much of the beauty of our faith is that it is a faith, and not a science&#8230; there is much we do not know, cannot know, even with the Bible in front of us.  I would dare say it asks more questions than it answers, and does so for good reason.  This book, like the challenges of our lives, point us toward God&#8230; they almost compel us to our knees to say &#8220;God, why?&#8221; &#8211; and through asking, coming into relationship with Him.  </p>
<p>You&#8217;ll recall how one day, people asked Christ &#8220;who sinned?” to cause a man to be born blind.  Surely, it is logical to believe that blindness is sub-optimal, as bad for humanity as, say, confusion about scripture.  But Jesus answered that nobody sinned &#8211; the man was born blind so that the glory of God might be revealed in him.  How often did the blind reach out to Christ in ways that those with sight did not?  They knew they needed God &#8211; and in much the same way, we who are hated for being glbt are driven to cry out to the Father for His love.  We know our need, we know that there are things beyond our control (how better to know that when &#8220;your own&#8221; body betrays you?)&#8230; we know in a way that is unique, how powerful God is, and how weak we are.  We know how amazing is His grace.  But the point here is, God uses things human beings find flawed to achieve great things.  He uses the weak to lead the strong.  </p>
<p>As a gay person, when I became a Christian, I had to struggle with the question of why a good God, a God that I knew loved and accepted me as I am, created me as I am&#8230; why that God would allow His church to be so cruel to His gay and lesbian children.  Such cruelty could not be the ideal for the church, same as blindness could not be the ideal for humanity, I thought.  But eventually, it came to me, like my beloved&#8217;s voice whispering in my ear&#8230; the power of our God is most clearly seen in His power to redeem.  Humanity breaks things &#8211; we divide ourselves one against the other, we oppress, we are confused, we sin &#8211; but the glory of God is revealed when He takes our brokenness in hand and redeems it.  By this, I do not mean His glory is revealed when God turns gay people straight &#8211; the shattered languages of Babble were not reunited at Pentecost; the Spirit spoke to all in their own tongues, transcending division in a way which continues to impress people to this day.  I mean that God uses our brokenness for His purposes.  When the day comes that the church embraces GLBT people, transcending the sexism, privilege, pride and fear that underlie homophobia, it will bear witness to the love and greatness of God, and His promise of welcome to all &#8211; and the glory will all be His.  Until that day, I will patiently endure, tell my story, and pray that His kingdom come.</p>
<p>Blessings to you,<br />
Casey</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.interstateq.com/archives/2391/comment-page-1/#comment-51014</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 16:03:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.interstateq.com/archives/2391/#comment-51014</guid>
		<description>Kelsey... I want to thank you so much for your comments and thoughts and the kind manner in which you came to my website to have a dialogue and conversation. I wish more people would be as kind as you. Unfortunately most people who may not agree with me on these subjects would rather use degrading language.

Since you haven&#039;t done any of that, I appreciate it and I think our conversation will go well.

You stated: &lt;em&gt;How can Scripture truly remain the Word of God, if it is left up to the ever-changing interpretations of man to validate it? You said you believed that Scripture is unchanging, which i would take a step further to say that God Himself is unchanging. How could He then give such conflicting “revelations” between the ages of men, both being “right”, and yet remain unchanging in His ways? It just doesn’t add up.&lt;/em&gt;

Yes, I do believe that the Word of God is unchangeable, but exactly how do you view the Word of God? Is it literally the words on the page or something more? If your answer would be that the Word of God are only the words on a piece of paper, then I&#039;d ask you to look deeper and caution you against idolatry. The Bible teaches that the Word of God is, indeed, Jesus Christ himself. In the Gospel of John, Scripture says, &quot;In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.&quot;

So then, we come to learn that the Word of God is much, much more than simply words written on a piece of paper. Indeed, the Word of God is Christ himself.

So... That means that the Word encompasses more than just those words and the language on that paper; it encompasses both the life, the teachings and the spirit of our Christ.

As human society has grown we have come to realize, through the renewed learning and re-thinking of the Bible and with the help of God and the Holy Spirit, that some things sanctioned in the past (even by the Bible and, supposedly, God himself) are not right and are, in fact, morally, eternally wrong.

A thousand years ago people believed that God condoned slavery and you can certainly find passages in the &quot;Word of God&quot; (i.e. The Bible) to support such a claim. You can find certain passages in the &quot;Word of God&quot; (i.e. the Bible) to support a claim that says a woman is merely a man&#039;s property. The good news is that Christ has set us free... which also means that we know certain things once seen as sanctioned by God are wrong. We see that human love triumphs over hate and exclusion. We see that gay and lesbian people, yearning for nothing more than a stable, loving and committed relationship that is no different than the love experienced within straight couples.

I took great offense to the panelists&#039; assertions that my love for another man is &quot;counterfeit.&quot; My love is just as valid as any others.

I don&#039;t believe the real Word of God changes and I believe that every generation must take a look at the world around them and question what is right and what is wrong, using the our Christ as the guide. In recent times we have done that, leading to the end of slavery, the end to the subjugation of women and so many more wrongs. Hopefully, we will come to see that Christ&#039;s love also sets free from hate &amp; exclusion those faithful, Christ-seeking gay &amp; lesbian people currently left out of God&#039;s fold (as managed by humans here on this earth).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kelsey&#8230; I want to thank you so much for your comments and thoughts and the kind manner in which you came to my website to have a dialogue and conversation. I wish more people would be as kind as you. Unfortunately most people who may not agree with me on these subjects would rather use degrading language.</p>
<p>Since you haven&#8217;t done any of that, I appreciate it and I think our conversation will go well.</p>
<p>You stated: <em>How can Scripture truly remain the Word of God, if it is left up to the ever-changing interpretations of man to validate it? You said you believed that Scripture is unchanging, which i would take a step further to say that God Himself is unchanging. How could He then give such conflicting “revelations” between the ages of men, both being “right”, and yet remain unchanging in His ways? It just doesn’t add up.</em></p>
<p>Yes, I do believe that the Word of God is unchangeable, but exactly how do you view the Word of God? Is it literally the words on the page or something more? If your answer would be that the Word of God are only the words on a piece of paper, then I&#8217;d ask you to look deeper and caution you against idolatry. The Bible teaches that the Word of God is, indeed, Jesus Christ himself. In the Gospel of John, Scripture says, &#8220;In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.&#8221;</p>
<p>So then, we come to learn that the Word of God is much, much more than simply words written on a piece of paper. Indeed, the Word of God is Christ himself.</p>
<p>So&#8230; That means that the Word encompasses more than just those words and the language on that paper; it encompasses both the life, the teachings and the spirit of our Christ.</p>
<p>As human society has grown we have come to realize, through the renewed learning and re-thinking of the Bible and with the help of God and the Holy Spirit, that some things sanctioned in the past (even by the Bible and, supposedly, God himself) are not right and are, in fact, morally, eternally wrong.</p>
<p>A thousand years ago people believed that God condoned slavery and you can certainly find passages in the &#8220;Word of God&#8221; (i.e. The Bible) to support such a claim. You can find certain passages in the &#8220;Word of God&#8221; (i.e. the Bible) to support a claim that says a woman is merely a man&#8217;s property. The good news is that Christ has set us free&#8230; which also means that we know certain things once seen as sanctioned by God are wrong. We see that human love triumphs over hate and exclusion. We see that gay and lesbian people, yearning for nothing more than a stable, loving and committed relationship that is no different than the love experienced within straight couples.</p>
<p>I took great offense to the panelists&#8217; assertions that my love for another man is &#8220;counterfeit.&#8221; My love is just as valid as any others.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t believe the real Word of God changes and I believe that every generation must take a look at the world around them and question what is right and what is wrong, using the our Christ as the guide. In recent times we have done that, leading to the end of slavery, the end to the subjugation of women and so many more wrongs. Hopefully, we will come to see that Christ&#8217;s love also sets free from hate &#038; exclusion those faithful, Christ-seeking gay &#038; lesbian people currently left out of God&#8217;s fold (as managed by humans here on this earth).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
