LGBT leaders release letter of support; and, Why I’ve chosen Edwards

by Matt Comer, October 31, 2007, 8:36 pm

Today, LGBT community leaders from around the nation released a letter detailing their support for Presidential candidate, Senator John Edwards.

The letter (pdf) is below (further thoughts from me below that):

Dear Friends:

The 2008 Presidential elections offer our country and our community a chance to makehistory, by fundamentally restructuring American politics from the White House to the statehouse. That is why we are supporting Senator John Edwards for President and hope that you will consider joining us.

As the Democratic presidential nominee, John Edwards would represent nothing less than the chance to alter the conventional foundations of American politics. Edwards demonstrates strong leadership, not only on the critical issues facing the LGBT community, but also by offering bold ideas like guaranteeing universal health care to every man, woman and child in this nation, ending poverty in this country during our lifetime, and stopping global warming while creating hundreds of thousands of quality American jobs in a new energy economy. As the Democratic Party’s presidential nominee Edwards will run a 50-state campaign- helping to strengthen Democratic officials, not only in traditionally “blue” states, but also in “battleground” and “red” states.

Edwards’ “policy ideas are shaping the Democratic presidential race.”
The Economist- July 19, 2007

Edwards’ bold leadership on the critical issues, both on those unique to our community and those that transcend all communities, has set the policy agenda for this election, making it safe for others to follow. Edwards was the first candidate to offer a truly
universal health care plan, the first candidate to offer a comprehensive global warming proposal, and the first to offer a comprehensive HIV/AIDS strategy. Early on, Edwards accepted responsibility and apologized for his vote to invade Iraq, and he has consistently called upon Congress to stand up to President Bush to force an end to the war.

I am the candidate running for president on the Democratic side who’s actually won an election in a red state running against the Jesse Helms political machine.
John Edwards- “Meet the Press” October 7, 2007

Edwards is the Democrat with the best chance to regain the White House against all of the top Republican candidates and offers the best chance to help Democrats get elected in some of the toughest races in the country because of his appeal in traditionally “red” areas. According to Doug Shoen, former pollster for President Bill Clinton, Edwards is “the strongest individual match up” against Republicans in the general. Edwards puts into play states where Democrats running for president have not competed in years. For example, his strength in places like Kentucky, Missouri and Oklahoma, will help

Democrats competing in tight races, including for control of governorships and legislatures, control of which may mean more to LGBT Americans than most. While members of the LGBT community are by no means single-issue voters, you may be asking yourself what all of this has to do with the LGBT community and our agenda.

As most of us now realize, almost all of the victories for our community have been at the state and local level. These victories are largely due to the hard work, persistence and talent of LGBT statewide organizations and their allies. Because these activists devoted their lives to educating their neighbors and elected representatives, we have marriage in Massachusetts, civil unions in New Jersey, Vermont, California, New Hampshire and Connecticut, and laws providing workplace equality, safe schools, protection from hate crimes and domestic partnership registries in dozens of states and local municipalities.

As members of the LGBT community, we are supporting John Edwards for President because if we want to continue to see this kind of progress in the states and to see the bills that we all have worked so hard to get enacted, we need to maintain the majorities Democrats hold in statehouses and build new ones. And there is only one candidate with a 50-state plan who can ensure that we capitalize on the opportunities we have across the nation. That candidate is John Edwards.

Eric Stern, Former National Stonewall Democrats Executive Director

David Mixner, Former Bill Clinton for President Adviser

Dan Hinkley, Nevada Stonewall Democratic Caucus President

John A. Pérez, Democratic National Committee Member

Sal Rosselli, SEIU California State Council President, former Alice B. Toklas Club President

Linda Elliott, Human Rights Committee Board of Directors Member

David Tseng, Kerry-Edwards 2004 National LGBT Advisory Committee Co-Chair

Skip Paul, Corporate Executive

Jenny Durkan, Washington LGBT Community Leader

Scott Benson, Majority Leader Minneapolis City Council

Kenda Kirby, former Executive Director of North Carolina Human Rights Initiative

Ian Palmquist, Equality North Carolina, Executive Director

Eric Marcus, Author and Gay Activist

Scott Wiener, Human Rights Campaign Board of Directors Member

Ken Keechl, Broward County Commissioner; Former Dolphin Democrats President

Ron Ginsburg, LGBT Community Activist

Gregory G. Simoncini, Commissioner of Illinois Human Rights Commission

Jeff Gardner, Vice Chair of Garden State Equality

James Duff, TV Producer

Robert D. Horvath, Mautner Project Board of Directors Member

Patrick J. Lyden, LGBT Community Activist; Homeland Security Advisor

Kevin Jennings, New York LGBT Community Activist

Stephen Handwerk, Board Member of National Stonewall Democrats

Jeff Anderson, Former Co-Chair of John Kerry for President National LGBT Finance Committee

Jeff Soukup, Former President and COO, PlanetOut Inc.

Andy Szekeres, Former Colorado Stonewall Co Chair

Sean Kosofsky, Michigan LGBT Community Leader

Mark Periello, Former Human Rights Campaign staff member

Kyle Bailey, Board member of National Stonewall Democrats

Hans Johnson, President of Progressive Victory

Todd Elmer, Former Clinton Administration Commerce Department Official

Les Krambeal, Board member of National Stonewall Democrats

Leslie Giblett, Washington LGBT Community Leader

Alexis Pontikis, Washington LGBT Community Leader

Gregg Gallo, National Stonewall Board Members

David Mariner, Former Out for Howard Dean Co-Chair

Matt Comer, LGBT Journalist

*Organizations listed for identification purposes only

As you can plainly see, I was a signatory of the letter.

Many of you may have read my Tuesday post, “Obama: Stand up for what is right.”

In that post I detailed my feelings and concerns over Senator Barack Obama’s “Embrace the Change” gospel tour, and specifically, the concert featuring ex-gay Donnie McClurkin in Columbia, S.C. In the post, I also published a letter I sent to the Obama campaign (excerpt):

I am a person who was deeply hurt (and continues to hurt daily) from being raised in a church and religious setting that taught gay and lesbian people should be put to death (”Put all the queers on a ship, pluck a hole into the side of it and send it out to sea,” my preacher would say).

I cannot support any person – whether that be a Presidential candidate or a city council candidate – who helps to give even the slightest hint of credibility to an idealogical viewpoint that is very closely linked to the real and ever-present spiritual violence I was exposed to as a youth. I was a gay adolescent attempting to come to terms with myself, my God, my church, family, community and society. People like Donnie McClurkin never made it easier.

I understand that the Senator wants to reach out to as many people as possible. I do understand that. I’m not totally inept when it comes to politics and I know (perhaps not as much as the Senator) how the game is played: Reach out to the most people without compromising one’s own values, get the most votes and win an election.

Unfortunately, Sen. Obama will have to make a decision. Does he sacrifice the votes of black evangelicals who will be turned off by his support of LGBT people and their right to exist (literally, their right to exist)? Does he try to play both angles reaching out to LGBT people and telling them they do have the right to exist while at the same time reaching out to a group who think that I should be invisible, “converted,” guilty of a crime or, at worst, put to death?

At the beginning of the election season, I fervently supported both Sen. Edwards and Sen. Obama. In fact, I even put little buttons here on my site for both of them. Those buttons are long gone, but they remained on the site containing more personal, professional information about me (www.matthillcomer.com). I have since removed the button for Obama.

I have also removed from myself – from my heart and soul – any support I once held for Sen. Obama’s campaign for the Presidency. Because Sen. Obama chose to honor and lend his credibility to a leader of a movement I find immensely dangerous to me, my brothers and sisters in the LGBT community and to all of America, I can no longer support him.

Sen. Obama has, unfortunately, chosen to honor his desire for votes over his obligation to stand for equality. He has chosen to honor religion strife with lies, hypocrisy, prejudice and hate over his obligation to speak out for the inherent worth and dignity of every person.

His attempts to balance respect and equality for LGBT Americans with the hate and exclusion of those who stand utterly opposed to LGBT equality are lame and offensive. Furthermore, his pandering and “vote-getting” behavior is nothing less than political posturing simply for the sake of winning.

As the young high school student told Sen. John McCain: I wanted to see a leader, but I don’t see one here.

Senator Edwards, on the other hand, is the only candidate who has continuously stood up for the respect and equality of LGBT people. I respect that Sen. Edwards can say he is “not quite there yet” and temper that with a policy position that, unlike other candidates, has not pushed entirely closed the door to full equality on the issue of marriage. Also, Sen. Edwards has not attempted to lie down with those who, if they had there way, would like to see nothing less than the disappearance of every LGBT person on the globe.

As for non-LGBT related issues, I agree most with Sen. Edwards’ plans for healthcare, poverty, education and domestic affairs. He is a candidate who most represents my views and one who respects me and my personhood.

Furthermore, just as Sen. Obama shows no regret over his pandering to a hate and prejudice filled movement, I am not regretful in the least over my separation from supporting the Obama campaign.

In the North Carolina primary, my vote will be going to Sen. John Edwards – a candidate who fully supports me, my community and our dignity and worth.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , ,

4 Responses to “LGBT leaders release letter of support; and, Why I’ve chosen Edwards”

  • Matt,
    I commend you for bringing the facts about Senator Obama to the readers of InterstateQ. I, however, differ with your opinion on Mr. Edwards (he is no longer a Senator). There are a few statements made in your post that I wanted to comment on. I want to first say that I respect your right to choose who you feel will be best for the values you seek and my comments are only to further engage the conversation of LGBT rights and the run for the White House.

    In one paragraph you state:

    Senator Edwards, on the other hand, is the only candidate who has continuously stood up for the respect and equality of LGBT people. I respect that Sen. Edwards can say he is “not quite there yet” and temper that with a policy position that, unlike other candidates, has not pushed entirely closed the door to full equality on the issue of marriage. Also, Sen. Edwards has not attempted to lie down with those who, if they had there way, would like to see nothing less than the disappearance of every LGBT person on the globe.

    You state in the first sentence of that paragraph that “Senator Edwards, on the other hand, is the only candidate who has continuously stood up for the respect and equality of LGBT people.” Matt, you know that this statement isn’t totally accurate. Many of the Democratic candidates have voiced support of LGBT rights. Many have gone beyond voicing their support and been active in legislation. The fact is, Senator Clinton is one of the only “mainstream” candidates running on the Democratic ticket that has put her voice into action. She has historically been fair to our community both in policy and action. Her recent support of critical legislation (including the hate crimes bill and ENDA) reinforce her support of LGBT people. It’s common knowledge many of Senator Clinton’s closest friends are gay & lesbian.

    The reality is, Mr. Edwards chooses to use religion as a crutch to deny full and equal rights to the LGBT community. His wife rebuttals the media by saying that she has gay friends who John hangs out with. Sorry, that’s just not good enough for me. If Mr. Edwards don’t have LGBT friends in his personal life, what makes you think he will support us in his public life?

    Senator Clinton has been a champion for many communities – not just the LGBT. She has been the inspiration behind giving middle-class children insurance, fighting for women’s rights and has been a friend of the economy. Her work in legal aid has helped thousands retain their constitutional rights and be treated fairly.

    When it comes down to the bottom line, I’m supporting Hillary Clinton for president because I believe she not only has the experience to get the job done – she also has demonstrated her willingness to be fair to all people.

    As I said, you deserve the right to vote for who you want. But to say that John Edwards is the only candidate who has been fair to the LGBT community is just not true.

    Thanks Matt for engaging in the conversation and for all the work you’re doing to bring attention to the electoral process.

  • Brandon, I shouldn’t have to remind you that Sen. Clinton is the one who supported her husband when “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” was instituted. Also, I shouldn’t have to remind you about Sen. Clinton’s convoluted reasoning as to why DADT was a “good thing.” Her argument: DADT was a step toward getting rid of the gay ban. Two steps forward, one back anyone?

    I’m borrowing this from a friend:

    In addition to the fact that he’s the most electable Democrat in the race, it’s easy to see why from a policy perspective gay and lesbian Americans support John Edwards over Hillary or Barack:

    First, Barack showed his true colors last week by courting evangelical voters by using a known homophobe as his surrogate. And Donnie McClurkin wasn’t the only homophobe on the tour as Mary Mary compared gays and lesbians to murderers and prostitutes. If Barack had really wanted to lead, he would have admitted that he made a mistake and then cancelled the tour. Instead, he tried to sweep it all under the carpet by asking a gay minister to join the tour. Too little, too late.

    Second, that episode came on the heels of both Barack and Hillary’s failure to respond when General Pace said that gays and lesbains are immoral. Edwards immediately denounced this statement. Hillary and Barack took days to see how they should respond (and only after they saw the public’s reaction).

    Third, Edwards wants to repeal Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell. The Clinton’s put it in place and now Hillary is saying that passing DADTwas all part of a long-term strategy to get rid of it. Huh? Talk about “two steps back”. She should explain her brilliant strategy to the thousands of proud gay and lesbian Americans who were drummed out of the service because of her support for DADT. Or how about to the American tax payers who have spent millions training those individuals only to have that investment flushed down the toilet of DADT.

    Fourth, Edwards wants to repeal ALL of the so-called Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA). Hillary only wants to repeal a PORTION of it (she believes that states should still be allowed to discriminate and violate the full faith and credit clause of the Constitution). Besides, we wouldn’t even have DOMA if it weren’t for the Clintons. They said that Bill hated “having” to sign DOMA, but then they were up on the air with ads in the South within two weeks boasting of how Bill took the lead to pass DOMA.

    Fifth, Hillary is also lying about DOMA and the anti-gay Federal Marriage Amendment (FMA). She says that DOMA was all part of an effort to stop the FMA. But there was no FMA until EIGHT years later. She doesn’t really expect us to buy that line, does she?

    Sixth, Edwards supports ending immigration discrimination against gay and lesbian families by passing the “Uniting American Families Act”. Barack and Hillary both oppose the Act. Get this: based on “national security” concerns. Where have we heard that crap before? Go see for yourself; look at their responses to the HRC questionnaire (if you can even find the actual responses any more since the Hillary-loving HRC staff appears to have taken it down and only shows their white-washed summary of the responses in tabular form without any of the details which are what really tell the story. Same thing goes with Hillary’s response only favoring partial repeal of DOMA).

    Seventh, Edwards supports federally funded needle exchange. Hillary does not, saying that there is not the “political will” to pass it. I thought that she said she wanted to be a leader and that she knew how to work in Washington. I guess that only applies when it comes to getting money from lobbyists, huh?

    Eighth, during the 2004 campaign, Bill Clinton took it upon himself to call John Kerry to tell Kerry to support the anti-gay Federal Marriage Amendment. Kerry refused to throw us under the bus, but Clinton showed (yet again) what he’s made of and where his principles are. And the saddest part is that Hillary boasts that he would be one of her top advisors. With “friends” like that …

    You know the old saying, “Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me.” The Clintons have fooled us time and time again. Barack has now shown his true colors as well.

    It’s time for us to wake up and support Edwards. He’s the best Democrat in the race and he’s also the most electable!

  • 3
    adam kautz Says:

    Matt I have decided based on the facts you presented that John Edwards is the best and only choice us gays can live with. If either Hillary or Obama win the nomination I will vote for a Libertarian Candidate as they are the only other party out there that are truly commited to our equality. because to me choosing the lesser of two evils is still evil. I would rather choose the one that will do the most for us LGBT’s.

  • Adam… that is completely your decision. I support Edwards for the nomination for all the reasons above. However, I am still a loyal Democrat and will support who ever wins the nomination. I may not be entirely happy about who wins the nomination, but I will still support my party.

Leave a Reply

InterstateQ.com welcomes your comments. Leave a reply and join the conversation! Rude, offensive or inappropriate comments, or those directly attacking any person or group of people, may be removed by the administrator at any time.