QPoll: Easley and ‘pansy’

by Matt | May 1st, 2008 |

Q-Notes has been running the Easley/”pansy” controversy as the subject of our QPoll since Tuesday afternoon. Only 59 people have voted (as of 10:00 a.m., May 1).

Here’s the question: “Was N.C. Gov. Mike Easley’s use of the word ‘pansy’ inappropriate and/or homophobic?”

Of the responses, here’s the general run-down:

  • It was inappropriate and homophobic 22%
  • It was inappropriate, homophobic and/or sexist 32%
  • It was inappropriate but not homophobic 24%
  • I have no problem with the comment 22%
  • I’m not sure 0%

What’s it all mean, you ask?

The responses mean that the overwhelming majority of respondents believe Gov. Easley’s use of the word “pansy” was inappropriate (78 percent), but not all respondents agree on why it was inappropriate:

  • Most respondents (32 percent) said the comment was “homophobic and/or sexist.”
  • The second most popular response (24 percent) was that the comment was “inappropriate but not homophobic.”
  • Tied evenly (22 percent) respondents said the comment was “inappropriate and homophobic” or they had “no problem with the comment.”

Go cast your vote and have your say.

MattAbout the Author: Matt
Matt, 22, is an LGBT journalist, activist and youth advocate currently living and working in Charlotte, N.C. A native of Winston-Salem, N.C., Matt attended the University of North Carolina at Greensboro and is still continuing to pursue his bachelors degree. He is the Owner & Editor of InterstateQ.com and has been active in LGBT advocacy work since the age of 14.

View all posts by Matt

  1. One Response to “QPoll: Easley and ‘pansy’”

  2. it means wimp how is this bad?

    http://www.queersunited.blogspot.com

    By queerunity on May 5, 2008

Post a Comment