<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: UN statement on gay rights: Why the U.S. didn&#8217;t sign</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.interstateq.com/archives/3093/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.interstateq.com/archives/3093/</link>
	<description>LGBT news/opinion from Matt Comer, journalist, activist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 18:48:04 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Are Laws Banning Homosexuality Like Apartheid? &#187; Equal Roots</title>
		<link>http://www.interstateq.com/archives/3093/comment-page-1/#comment-119669</link>
		<dc:creator>Are Laws Banning Homosexuality Like Apartheid? &#187; Equal Roots</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 03:06:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.interstateq.com/?p=3093#comment-119669</guid>
		<description>[...] the end of 2009, the UN put forth its first statement ever on the issue of LGBT rights.  More than 65 countries signed a statement calling for a worldwide end to criminalizing [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the end of 2009, the UN put forth its first statement ever on the issue of LGBT rights.  More than 65 countries signed a statement calling for a worldwide end to criminalizing [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jarred</title>
		<link>http://www.interstateq.com/archives/3093/comment-page-1/#comment-118433</link>
		<dc:creator>Jarred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 14:41:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.interstateq.com/?p=3093#comment-118433</guid>
		<description>So wait, the U.S. firmly condemns human right violations based on sexual orientation, but wants to make sure the individual states&#039; ability to allow gay people&#039;s rights to housing and employment to be violated.  Am I the only one sensing a bit of cognitive dissonance over that one?

Or does the federal government simply feel that equal access to housing and employment are not human rights?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So wait, the U.S. firmly condemns human right violations based on sexual orientation, but wants to make sure the individual states&#8217; ability to allow gay people&#8217;s rights to housing and employment to be violated.  Am I the only one sensing a bit of cognitive dissonance over that one?</p>
<p>Or does the federal government simply feel that equal access to housing and employment are not human rights?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.interstateq.com/archives/3093/comment-page-1/#comment-117715</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 00:29:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.interstateq.com/?p=3093#comment-117715</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t you remember the big kumbayah moment when the Orthodox Jewish Zionists of Israel, the Christianists, and the Muslims got together to condemn the Israeli government for permitting a gay pride march in the &quot;holy city?&quot;

Bashing gay people bring the religious nuts together. Go figure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t you remember the big kumbayah moment when the Orthodox Jewish Zionists of Israel, the Christianists, and the Muslims got together to condemn the Israeli government for permitting a gay pride march in the &#8220;holy city?&#8221;</p>
<p>Bashing gay people bring the religious nuts together. Go figure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
